Asking whether double or triple glazed aluminum windows are worth the cost usually gets a price back. That price is almost always the wrong answer, because the real question has two parts: what does the third pane physically change about the window, and does that change buy the performance your project actually needs? This article skips the price table and gives you the decision frame instead — the part you can act on before asking for a quote.
A third pane of glass is not a small option. It is a different glazing package, and it pulls on three parts of the window at once.
It is tempting to treat "triple" as automatically the better window. It is not. The number that matters for your heating and cooling bill is the whole-window value, and that value is set by three things working together: the glass, the edge spacer, and the frame.
A thermally broken frame removes a large share of the frame's own heat loss. ALPES uses a PA66GF25 multi-chamber thermal break — in the C116, the strips run 34–44mm wide across several chambers. When the frame is already that well isolated, a carefully specified double glazing (warm-edge spacer, argon or inert-gas fill, low-emissivity coating) on the same frame can land close to a modest triple on a weaker frame. The third pane buys more insulation, but it buys it on top of a frame that is already doing its job.
One honesty note that protects you: the K values ALPES publishes — 1.3 for the AW90 passive series, 1.6 for the C120, 1.7 for the C116 — are system values tied to a chosen glazing specification. They are not a property of the frame alone, and they are not a promise about what your double or triple unit will measure. Always ask for the value written against your exact glass build-up.
Triple is worth the extra cost in a handful of clear situations:
Triple is harder to justify when the building is cooling-dominated — you may actually want the solar gain, and the extra weight and cost buy little. It also lags when the envelope around the windows is leaky: spend on airtightness and roof or wall insulation first, because a third pane in a draughty house changes the bill very little.
Why a single price is the wrong unit. The cost of glazing is quoted per opening, per square metre of glass, or per square metre of wall — and those denominators give very different answers. A large fixed panel and a small operable casement priced per square metre look nothing alike, because the hardware and the frame corners are fixed costs that do not scale with glass area.
The cost curve is not straight. The smallest windows carry the same per-sash hardware and corner costs as large ones, so they are expensive per square metre. Mid-size openings are usually the cheapest per unit. Very large panels climb again, because the heavier glazing needs rated hardware, more careful handling, and sometimes structural consideration. None of this is visible in a flat "triple costs more" line.
What actually moves the quote, on any system: the glazing thickness and cavity, the frame series, the hardware rating, the gas fill, and the surface finish. ALPES quotes on the full specification — you define the glass, they price the system built around PA66GF25 breaks and 6060-T66 profiles. A 72 x 60 sliding window, for example, carries its glass on pulleys rated to 200kg in the TS130, and the same sash-weight question applies whether you choose double or triple.
Read the table below as a map of where triple glazing would sit, not as a ranking. All values are published system figures; the glass build-up is the variable you choose.
| Series | Frame wall width | Glass sash thickness | Thermal break | Published K (system) | Hardware |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C113 casement | 113mm | 57mm | PA66GF25 multi-chamber | not published per series | CMECH (Red Dot, 30,000-cycle tested) |
| C120 casement | 119mm | 62mm | PA66GF25 | 1.6 | ROTO |
| C116 casement | 116mm | 81mm | 34–44mm PA66GF25 multi-chamber | 1.7 | Wehag (optional) |
| TS130 sliding | 130mm | 55mm | PA66GF25 | not published per series | ROTO side-pressure, 200kg pulleys |
| AW90 tilt-turn (passive) | 90mm | 90mm | multi-chamber + sponge | 1.3 | Winkhaus |
| Your situation | Default recommendation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| New build, low-energy target | Triple where the spec demands it | The third pane is a small slice of a build already committed to airtightness |
| Retrofit into a leaky existing wall | Double first, fix the envelope | A third pane cannot fix air leakage around it |
| Hot, cooling-dominated climate | Double, optimise solar control | You may want the gain; triple adds cost and weight for little |
| Busy road, rail, or airport | Triple on the noisy facades | Mass and cavity earn their keep on acoustics |
| Large glazed wall | Triple on the dominant elevations | Aggregate effect across many units is real |
| Ask for | Why it matters | Red-flag answer |
|---|---|---|
| Whole-window value in writing | Centre-pane ignores frame and edge | "Around 1.0" with no build-up |
| Rebate depth for your chosen triple | Confirms the sash actually fits | "Standard frame" with no dimension |
| Hardware rating for the heavier sash | Hinges and carriers must carry the weight | "Heavy duty" with no cycle or load figure |
| Gas fill and spacer specified | Drives the edge loss | "Argon" with no spacer type |
| Finish impact on the quote | Dual-colour adds cost | "Same price" for two-pass coating |
Can I upgrade from double to triple later?
Only if the frame rebate was designed for it. Most systems size the sash to one package; check the manufacturer's maximum glazing thickness before assuming an upgrade is possible.
Does triple make the room darker?
Slightly. The extra pane and coating reduce visible light by a small amount. With clear or low-iron glass and a slim frame the difference is usually minor.
Is triple always warmer?
Warmer at the glass, yes, but only as part of a whole-window value that also depends on the frame and the seal. A broken frame with double can beat a weak frame with triple.
What about sash weight on sliding windows?
Sliding sashes ride on carriers rated for a load — ALPES rates the TS130 pulley to 200kg. The heavier triple sash must stay within that rated load, so the glass build-up and panel size move together.
Will triple pay for itself in energy savings?
Not usually as a direct payback on heating alone. The stronger cases are comfort, noise, and hitting a low-energy target. Treat the third pane as performance spending, not a saving plan.
How do I compare quotes fairly?
Compare written whole-window values for the same glass build-up, same frame series, and same finishes. A bare "triple versus double" price with no build-up attached is not comparable.
The honest answer to "which is worth the cost" is that it depends on your envelope, your climate, and your noise — not on a generic price. Send ALPES your opening schedule and target value, and the quote will tell you the real delta for your project.