A glass sliding door with a black frame is normally bought as a look. The look is real. The piece that carries the colour, however, is much smaller than the phrase suggests. Take the largest single sash our SL126 / 182 (75) series publishes, 2500 mm by 3000 mm, subtract the frame faces and the central interlock, and the glass you actually see is about 6.89 square metres out of 7.50. The aluminium works out at about 0.61 square metres, or roughly eight percent. On the SL155 at its published 2800 by 2600 single sash the aluminium share is about ten percent. In both cases roughly nine tenths of what you look at, every day, is glass.
That matters because of what people mean when they say they want a black door. They very rarely mean I would like 0.6 square metres of aluminium to be black. They mean the whole opening should read dark. And the whole opening cannot be made dark by painting the frame. It is made dark by the glass, which is a specification written in a completely different vocabulary: build-up, coating position, solar absorption, heat treatment.
Black is also the only colour we know of that three separate published manuals score in three different directions. A coatings regime treats it as the hardest colour to hold. An Australian glass industry technical sheet treats a dark frame as a small improvement on one specific risk. A sealant manufacturer's joint-design tables treat dark colour as a ten degree increase in the number that sizes every joint. All three are right. They measure three different things, owned by three different trades, frozen at three different moments in the project. Most black-frame projects go wrong because somebody treated them as one decision.
The table below is our own arithmetic, run on our own published figures. Assumptions, stated so you can change them: the published frame width is treated as the visible face on all four sides; the published sash width is treated as the width of the central interlock where two panels meet; the track, the handle and any additional mullion are ignored.
| Series | Published max single sash | Frame width we publish | Sash / interlock width we publish | Computed visible glass | Computed visible aluminium | Aluminium share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SL126 / 182 (75) | 2500 x 3000 mm | 36 mm | 75 mm | about 6.89 square metres | about 0.61 square metres | about eight percent |
| SL155 | 2800 x 2600 mm | 62 mm | 44.5 mm | about 6.52 square metres | about 0.76 square metres | about ten percent |
One honest limit on that table: we publish a frame width and a sash width. We do not publish a head-on interlock sightline, and we are not going to imply one by subtracting numbers until we arrive at a figure that looks good in a brochure. If your elevation drawing needs a sightline, ask for a section drawing with the dimension written on it. The same caution applies to the frame width figure itself, which is a visible face on one profile and not a promise about how the meeting stile reads from a sofa.
| Route | Where the darkness comes from | What it does to heat | Who supplies it | What is usually left out of the order |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body-tinted glass | Colour is in the glass itself, grey, bronze or green. Grey is spectrally neutral, so it dims the view without shifting colour. | Absorbs rather than reflects, so the pane itself gets hotter than clear glass. The darker the tint, the higher the absorption. | Glass processor | Heat treatment. Absorption rises as visible transmission falls; below roughly 40 percent visible transmission, published guidance points to heat-strengthened or fully tempered glass. |
| Coated glass | Low-emissivity or solar-control coating, sometimes visibly reflective. The face colour is a coating property. | A reflective coating on tinted glass sits in the highest absorption band published by the Australian glass sheet. | Glass processor | Which face of which pane carries the coating, and which pane of the unit is the one under thermal load. |
| Dark edge elements | Ceramic frit border, dark warm-edge spacer, dark edge seal, dark setting blocks. | Puts the darkest material at the edge, which is exactly where a thermal crack originates and where you most need to see it. | Glass processor and unit builder | Edge finish quality and edge cover in millimetres. Edge cover over 40 mm is called out as raising risk. |
| Hardware, gaskets, brushes and sealant | Handle finish, lock and keep finish, brush pile colour, gasket colour, perimeter bead colour. | Nothing thermal. Everything visual. | Hardware brand, gasket maker, installer | The finish schedule for the parts. A black sash with a bright handle and a grey brush pile is the single most common way a black door stops looking black. |
So the purchase is not one colour. It is one colour decision on the profile, plus three decisions about glass, plus a fourth about parts that come from other suppliers and are almost never held to the same colour standard as the extrusion. If your enquiry says black frame and stops there, four of those five decisions are still open, and three of them will be made by somebody who has not read your elevation.
We have written elsewhere on this site about what powder coating is and how it differs from anodizing, so this section covers only what is specific to black.
The two changes you can see on a dark frame are chalking and gloss loss. Both present as a whitening or greying of a surface that was meant to stay dark, which is why they are noticed on black long before they are noticed on white, and why a black frame is the hardest colour in the range to keep looking planted. Neither is judged by counting years. Both are judged by method: colour change measured instrumentally against a reference, chalk assessed by a rating method, gloss measured by a defined geometry, each after a stated exposure and at stated observation conditions. When a supplier offers you a dark frame, the documents worth having are the coating standard and its version, the test methods used, and the conditions the result was read under. A duration quoted without those three is the most misused number in this category, and we are not going to print one.
Then there is batch. A custom black is mixed and applied as a batch. Two batches of the same black on the same elevation are two blacks, and on a long run of doors the difference is visible in raking light. The practical rule is that the whole elevation should come from one production batch, and that the batch reference should be recorded against each unit so that a replacement panel years later can be matched to the doors still standing rather than to a code on a screen.
Here is the part that changes what you are buying. Our published colour card does not include black. It lists Ice Cream White, Aurora Gray, Starry Sky Gray and Brown Coffee, with custom matching available, and Aurora Gray is the one described as a deep, near-black tone. So a true black on our line is a custom match. That is not a problem, but it is not the same object as a stocked colour: a name on a card is an item with a batch history behind it, while a custom match is a specification with a reference sample, a tolerance and a batch plan of its own. Ask for all three in writing before the profile reaches the line, because that is the moment it becomes permanent.
This is the section most black-frame advice gets backwards. An Australian glass industry technical sheet on thermal breakage states that dark coloured materials will promote fewer edge temperature differences than light coloured frames. Read plainly: on the specific mechanism that drives thermal breakage, a black aluminium frame is a small step in the safer direction, because a warmed frame reduces the centre-to-edge temperature difference across the pane. That is the opposite of what most buying guides say, and it is published by people who sell glass, not by people who sell frames.
The same sheet then lists everything else that raises the risk, and almost every item on that list is something a black-glass brief tends to add:
The same document recommends that a thermal assessment be carried out, and an Australian industry defects and tolerance guideline that reproduces the same text adds the sentence that decides most arguments: thermal breakage is not covered by the manufacturer's warranty. Two published versions of the same Australian text exist and they do not agree on every figure; one gives the confined-space temperature as over 90 degrees and another as high as 70 degrees. We are reporting the disagreement rather than picking a side, because the useful instruction is the same either way: get the assessment, in writing, before the glass is cut.
| Glass type, as published by the Australian glass sheet | Solar absorption band | Published risk band | What that means for a black brief |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clear | about 18 percent | Low | The reference case. Nothing about a black frame changes this row. |
| Tinted or low-emissivity coated | about 30 to 40 percent | Medium | This is the row most dark-glass specifications land in. |
| High light-transmitting coating on tinted glass | about 45 to 55 percent | Medium to high | Two dark routes stacked. Ask which pane carries which treatment. |
| Reflective coating on clear | about 60 to 70 percent | High | Reads very dark from outside. Carries a high stress band. |
| Reflective coating on tinted | about 80 to 85 percent | Very high | The darkest and the highest band in the same cell. This is the combination that most needs a written assessment. |
Now put the two halves together. Painting the frame black moves one line in the safer direction on this axis. Making the glass black moves two or three bands in the other. Since roughly nine tenths of the visible door is glass, the thing people actually want is almost entirely the second one. That is not an argument against a black door. It is an argument for heat-treating the glass and for writing the glass build-up into the order instead of leaving it inside a colour conversation.
| Glass type | Relative thermal strength, strongest to weakest as published | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Toughened glass | Strongest in the published ordering | One UK glazing specialist publishes that standard toughened glass withstands a temperature difference of up to about 200 degrees across its surface, against about 40 degrees for float glass. |
| Heat strengthened glass | Next, below toughened | Cools more slowly, ends with roughly half the surface compression of full temper, and breaks into larger pieces than toughened glass. |
| Thin annealed float, then laminated annealed float | Middle of the ordering | Annealed glass is the one that shows the classic thermal fracture, a single crack from the edge with no shattering. |
| Thick annealed float, then thick annealed laminated | Lower | Thickness raises risk through edge quality and handling, not through strength. |
| Patterned annealed, then wired glass | Weakest in the published ordering | Wired glass is named in the same sheet as among the most susceptible to thermal breakage. |
On strength multipliers the published numbers do not agree either. One source says tempering makes glass four to five times stronger than annealed glass; another says tempered is about four times and heat-strengthened about twice. We are not going to pick one. Ask your glass supplier to state, for each pane, which treatment it has and against which standard.
If a pane in a black sliding door breaks, three causes write three different signatures, and the signature is what decides who pays. This matters more on a dark door than on a light one for a reason given below.
| Cause | Where it starts | What it looks like | What it tells you | First thing to do |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal stress | Always at the edge | Starts at about 90 degrees to both the edge and the face, runs perpendicular to the edge for roughly 30 to 50 mm, then branches. Low stress gives one crack that wanders; high stress divides into several a short distance from the origin. | A temperature gradient across the pane, not an impact. Annealed or float glass shows this as a single crack with no shattering. | Photograph the origin before anything is swept up. The origin, not the middle, is the evidence. |
| Nickel sulphide inclusion | A point inside the pane, away from edges | A butterfly or figure-eight pattern radiating from a single interior point. | Only occurs in tempered glass. A manufacturing contamination, not a design or site problem. | Photograph before cleanup, and ask whether the pane was heat soak tested. |
| Impact | A single point, wherever it was struck | A starburst or bull's-eye with short radial legs, usually with a mark or crater at the centre. | Something hit it. Not a manufacturing issue. | Photograph the centre mark and its height above the floor. |
| Edge damage or a binding frame | An edge chip or a pressure point | Cracks radiating inward from an edge defect, often mixed with other indicators. | Handling, glazing or an opening that is out of square. Sometimes the only honest verdict is mixed. | Photograph the edge at the origin before the unit is removed. |
The reason this belongs in an article about black frames: a ceramic frit border, a dark warm-edge spacer or a dark edge seal puts the darkest material in the assembly directly over the first few centimetres of glass, which is precisely where a thermal crack begins and precisely where an investigator needs to look. A dark band at the edge does not cause the crack. It can make the origin harder to read during the first casual look, which is when most of the evidence disappears.
And one remedy is routinely misapplied. Heat soak testing is for nickel sulphide. It does not make glass resistant to thermal stress. A UK glazing specialist states this plainly on its own technical page: heat soaking reveals which panes are weak because of inclusions, and does not prevent thermal fracturing. For thermal stress the answer is heat strengthening or full tempering, chosen after a thermal assessment.
Colour enters structural arithmetic as a temperature. A Japanese sealant manufacturer publishes a joint-design page carrying two tables we have not seen reproduced anywhere in the window or door industry. The first lists linear expansion coefficients: aluminium extrusions 23, glass 9, concrete 10, steel 10, stainless steel 17, each times ten to the minus six per degree. The second lists an effective temperature difference for each material, and it splits that difference by surface colour. Aluminium extrusions are given 70 degrees for a light colour and 80 degrees for a dark colour. Concrete is given 35 degrees light and 40 to 45 degrees dark. For glass, no value is given for ordinary glass, while heat-absorbing and heat-reflecting types are given 55 degrees.
In other words, the same extrusion in the same wall is assigned a temperature range ten degrees wider because it is dark. Everything downstream is multiplied by it. Below is our own arithmetic, run on the largest single sash we publish, using only that table's own numbers.
| Calculation, ours | Input | Result | Where that movement has to go |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient difference, aluminium minus glass | 23 minus 9 equals 14, times ten to the minus six per degree | 14 microstrain per degree | It cannot go anywhere except into a clearance. |
| Frame versus glass, on the 3000 mm height | 14 x 10 to the minus six x 3000 mm x 80 degrees | about 3.36 mm | The clearance around the glass in the rebate, the setting blocks and the gaskets. |
| Frame versus glass, on the 2500 mm width | 14 x 10 to the minus six x 2500 mm x 80 degrees | about 2.80 mm | Same three places, on the other axis. |
| The colour increment alone, on the 3000 mm height | 23 x 10 to the minus six x 3000 mm x (80 minus 70) degrees | about 0.69 mm | This is the part that exists only because the frame is dark. The glass contributes nothing to it. |
| Frame versus wall, on the 3000 mm height | Aluminium dark 80 degrees gives 5.52 mm; concrete light 35 degrees gives 1.05 mm | a difference of about 4.5 mm | The perimeter sealant joint between frame and wall, and the movement capability of the sealant chosen for it. |
None of that movement disappears. It is absorbed in three places only: the clearance around the glass in the rebate, the setting blocks and gaskets, and the perimeter joint. Two of the three are designed by people who are not us, and all three are sized from a movement number rather than from a preference. The same published page sizes a joint from the movement it has to absorb and then selects the sealant by the movement capability it can take. On this axis, the word black is a structural input.
One consequence is practical enough to act on tomorrow. If the differential is about 3.4 mm on the height of that panel, then the clearance designed around the glass in the rebate is a thermal number, not a fitting tolerance. And the Australian glass sheet warns that breakage risk rises with edge cover over 40 mm. A deep, generously gripping black rebate therefore pulls in two directions at once: it looks better, and it raises the risk the sheet is describing. Edge cover and edge finish are one decision, and they belong to the glazier, not to the painter.
| Axis | What the published manual says about black | Who owns the decision | When it becomes irreversible | The document to ask for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coating and colour | Hardest colour to hold. Chalking and gloss loss show first on dark surfaces. | Coater and fabricator, on a written standard | The moment the profile is coated | Coating standard and version, test methods, observation conditions, reference sample |
| Glass and heat treatment | Dark frame lowers one risk; dark glass raises another by two or three bands. | Your designer and the glass processor | When the pane is cut, because nothing can be cut or drilled after tempering | Glass build-up pane by pane, heat treatment per pane, written thermal assessment |
| Movement and sealing | Dark colour adds ten degrees to the range that sizes every joint. | Designer and installer, not the factory | When the opening is built | Calculated joint movement and the sealant movement capability selected for it |
| Appearance and batch | Nine tenths of the visible surface is glass, not frame. | Whoever writes the schedule | At order, because batch is allocated then | Batch plan for the elevation and batch reference recorded per unit |
The most common failure we can describe without naming anyone is treating those four rows as one decision called the colour. They are not. They are four decisions, on four documents, held by four different people, and the only thing they share is the word.
| What we publish | What it actually measures | What it does not tell you | Why the gap is there |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6060-T66, 1.8 to 2.5 mm wall depending on series | Alloy and wall thickness | Nothing about colour, coating class or thermal breakage | It is the same across our series, so it is the floor of the range, not a differentiator between them |
| PA66GF25 multi-chamber strip, 34 to 44 mm on the C116 | The length of the thermal detour, not the thickness of an insulation layer | Not a whole-door thermal value, and not a value for your opening | A strip width is a component dimension; a K value belongs to a specimen |
| K value 1.3 on the AW90 | A system value for a stated specimen under a stated standard | Not a value for your door, and not a value for a sliding series | Change the size, the split, the glass or the standard and it is a new number |
| 240 hour salt spray and 5,000 N shear, on the AW90 | Coating-and-substrate corrosion, and the composite bond between strip and aluminium | Neither is a colour-fastness or weathering class, and neither transfers to another series | They are published results on one series, not a project qualification |
| Sash width 75 mm or 44.5 mm; frame width 36 mm or 62 mm | A visible face of a profile | Not a head-on interlock sightline, and not the glass rebate | We will not subtract our way to a sightline number we have not measured |
| Track heights 8, 43 and 45 mm, plus an 85 mm barrier option | Threshold and drainage choices | Nothing about colour or coating | They are decided by water and by floor levels, not by the palette |
| 400 kg twenty-wheel pulley and 220 kg driving capacity | Two different measurements, per sash, on an assumed glass build-up | Neither is a maximum panel size, and sorting them into one column is the most common misreading of a sliding-door catalogue | The glass you choose is the variable that moves them |
| Air, water and wind classes on the sliding series | Not published | There is nothing to compare | Ask for the standard, the specimen configuration and the report, rather than a class name |
| Coating standard, colour tolerance and batch control | Not published as a number on this page | Whether a specific black will hold on your elevation | Because the answer depends on your exposure, your reference sample and the batch, and we would rather send the document than print a claim |
Our swing door, folding door and entry door category pages are empty. We build sliding systems. Black-frame enquiries regularly arrive carrying items that are not sliding doors at all, and the honest answer is to name them as different products rather than stretch a sliding door to cover them. Three examples: a white entry door white is a stocked card colour rather than a matched one, so its whole colour problem is simpler than the one described above; a round top entry door changes the edge that has to be cut and finished, and edge quality is a listed factor in the thermal-breakage sheet; and bi fold shower doors are an all-glass assembly with their own hardware, their own wet-area glazing rules and a completely different edge condition. None of the three is in our line, and each has a maker who does it properly.
What we can do for a black sliding door is narrower and more specific: give you the profile dimensions and the section, tell you which colour references are stocked and which are matched, supply a physical reference sample, state the coating standard used for your order, and put the batch plan in writing. What we cannot do is sign a thermal assessment for your glass, choose your glass build-up for your climate, or guarantee that a black will not change on your elevation.
| Field | What a useful answer looks like | What happens if you leave it blank |
|---|---|---|
| Opening size in mm | A number, and a statement of whether it is the structural opening or the frame | Two trades will each assume the other one meant the other |
| Panel count and which panels move | Three panels, centre fixed, both outer panels sliding | You will be quoted the cheapest configuration and discover it at delivery |
| Colour reference | A card name, or an approved physical sample held by both sides | The word black is not a reference; two people will each supply their own |
| Coating standard and version | A named standard with its year, plus the test methods for colour change, chalk and gloss | Any later dispute has nothing to measure against |
| Gloss level and texture | Matt, satin, semi-gloss or textured, named | Same colour, different gloss, and they do not match in daylight |
| Batch plan | One batch for the whole elevation, batch reference recorded per unit | A replacement panel years later will not match the doors still standing |
| Glass build-up | Pane by pane, with coating type and which face carries it | Nobody can run a thermal assessment, and nobody will |
| Heat treatment per pane | Annealed, heat strengthened or toughened, stated for each pane, plus whether it is heat soak tested | The outer pane of a unit is the one under thermal load, and it is the one usually left unspecified |
| Thermal assessment | Done, or not done, and by whom | The published Australian position is that thermal breakage is not covered by the glass warranty |
| Edge cover and edge finish | A dimension in mm and a stated finish, cut, ground or polished | Edge cover over 40 mm is called out as raising risk, and nobody will be measuring it later |
| Internal shading | Type, colour, and the gap in mm around its perimeter | Light blinds close to the glass are named as a higher risk than dark ones, and a 50 mm gap changes the factor applied |
| Perimeter sealant | Movement capability named, and who specifies it | The joint between frame and wall is sized from movement, and it is not our scope to size it |
| Question | Answer that sounds reasonable but carries no information | Why it is empty |
|---|---|---|
| Is black available? | Yes, we can do any colour. | Any colour is not a coating standard, a gloss, or a batch. |
| What coating do you use? | High quality architectural powder. | An adjective where a standard and a year belong. |
| Will it fade? | It is guaranteed. | A guarantee is a document. Ask for the method, the exposure and the observation conditions. |
| Is the glass tinted? | It is solar control glass. | Solar control is a family. The band that decides thermal risk depends on the build-up. |
| Is it safety glass? | Yes, it is tempered. | Which pane. In a unit it is the outer pane that carries the thermal load. |
| Do we need to worry about thermal breakage? | Our glass is certified. | Certification is not a thermal assessment of your pane in your opening. |
| Is it heat soak tested? | All our glass is heat soaked. | Heat soaking addresses nickel sulphide. It does not prevent thermal fracturing. |
| Will the frame move? | Aluminium is stable. | Aluminium carries one of the highest coefficients in the published table, and dark colour widens its range. |
| Is it the same batch? | Same colour code. | A code is not a batch. Two batches of one code are two colours. |
| Can you match a panel later? | Just send us a photo. | A photograph has no batch reference. Ask for the original order number and the batch recorded against the unit. |
The frame is roughly eight to ten percent of the opening, so the glass does almost all of the thermal work. The K value we publish for one series is a system value for a stated specimen, not a value for your door. Ask for the glass build-up and for the solar and thermal figures your own authority's method requires, and expect them to come from your designer rather than from a colour discussion.
On the one published axis that isolates frame colour, an Australian glass industry sheet says dark coloured materials promote fewer edge temperature differences than light coloured frames, so the frame colour alone is not the usual suspect. The named drivers are glass type, edge cover, partial external shading, internal blinds close to the glass, direct air streams, applied film, and pane size and thickness.
For large panels, tinted or coated glass, partial shading or generous edge cover, published guidance points to heat strengthened or fully tempered glass and recommends a thermal assessment. State which pane. In a unit it is normally the outer pane that carries the thermal load.
No. A UK glazing specialist states this on its own technical page: heat soaking reveals panes containing nickel sulphide inclusions and does not prevent thermal fracturing. They are two different failures with two different signatures, and only one of them is addressed by heat soaking.
Because the judgement is made by standard, method, exposure and observation conditions, and because a duration separated from those conditions is the number most often repeated until it becomes a claim. Ask for the document instead. We would rather send you the standard and the test methods than print a figure you cannot check.
Sometimes, but a match needs a physical reference sample held by both sides, a stated gloss and texture, and a batch plan for the elevation. A name, a code or a photograph is not enough, and on a dark colour the difference between two batches is visible in raking light.