Read this before you copy anything out of this page. Every figure below that is not printed on an ALPES datasheet is quoted from a publicly published third-party source, and it belongs to that source's product and that source's market. None of them is a specification for your unit. Do not copy any of them into a drawing, a schedule or a purchase order. Ask for the number that belongs to your unit, in millimetres, on a section.
Ask ten suppliers what separates a double sliding door from a single sliding door and nine of them will give you the same answer: one has a fixed panel and one sliding panel, and the other has two sliding panels. The answer is correct. It is also almost useless, because it does not tell you which one to buy.
Here is what the answer leaves out. The number of panels that move has almost no effect on how far the door opens. A two-panel unit gives you a little under half of its own width as clear opening whether one leaf moves or both. The word double describes the mechanism, not the hole.
What actually changes when you unbolt the second leaf is seven other things: where the opening sits, who decides where it sits, what the non-moving panel is allowed to be, how many members have to agree at the centre joint, how many locks and anti-lift points exist, whether roller adjustment is a one-body problem or a two-body problem, and what the screen is supposed to cover. Those seven are the decision. The opening is not.
We have written elsewhere about what changes when you go from two panels to four. This piece starts where that one cannot reach: the same two panels, and the difference between letting one of them move and letting both of them move.
Before anything can be compared, the phrase has to be pinned down, because it is used for three different distinctions at once - and, in a fourth product family, for something that has no track at all.
| What the speaker is counting | Panels in the unit | What "single" then means | What it costs you if the meaning is not fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| How many of the two leaves are operable. This is the trade meaning in patio doors: one fixed plus one sliding, or both sliding. | Two, either way | One leaf slides, the other is fixed to the frame | You buy the second operable leaf expecting more opening, and receive the same opening with more hardware |
| How many leaves there are at all. A single sliding door here is one leaf running across a wall or across a closet face. | One, or two | One leaf, on an exposed track, covering an opening that has no second leaf | You are quoted a two-panel framed unit when you needed a single surface-mounted leaf: different track, different structure, different wall |
| How many pairs there are. "Double" here means two pairs parting at the centre of a wide opening. | Four | One pair | You quadruple the panel count and still land at about half the span, because the two centre leaves park against the outer fixed ones |
And then there is the fourth family, where the word has nothing to do with tracks. A wood double entry door is two hinged leaves that swing. No track, no rollers, no stacking zone - and, critically, no leaf parked behind another one, which is why "double" there really does give you the full width. The same word, in the same sentence shape, delivers two completely different results depending on whether the leaves hinge or slide. If your enquiry says "double door" without naming the family, you have not ordered anything yet.
The second row is worth a moment, because it is where searches go wrong. A bi-fold barn doors enquiry and a sliding patio door enquiry use the same verb and land on completely different hardware: one leaf on an exposed top-hung track, versus two leaves in a weathered frame with a drained sill. They share a word and almost nothing else.
Picture a two-panel slider of any width, closed. The two leaves meet at a vertical joint in the middle - the interlock. Now open one leaf as far as it will go. It travels along its track until it is standing over the other leaf. The free space it leaves behind is its own width minus the overlap it has to keep at the interlock, which is a little under half the unit.
Now do it with the other leaf. Same number. Both leaves cannot be open at the same time, because each of them has to park exactly where the other one is standing.
This is not our opinion. A publicly published patio-door guide states it in one clause: even if both panels slide, the maximum opening is half the door's total width. An installer's guide in the United Kingdom says the same thing in plainer language - you get roughly half the structural opening, minus the interlock stile, and you never get the whole hole.
Not every published source agrees, and the disagreement is the most useful thing on this page. One dealer guide describes two sliding panels as giving nearly the full width as a walk-through. A marketplace buying guide tabulates a two-leaf sliding door at a full opening. A third says that moving from single to double more than doubles the opening. Those figures belong to a different product - a stacking or pocketing system with three or more panels, where leaves can gather at one end or vanish into a wall cavity. They are true of that product and false of a two-panel unit. The word "double" is doing the work that a dimension ought to be doing.
Our own worked example, so that you can check the arithmetic. Take a 2400 mm two-panel unit on a series that publishes a 36 mm frame width and a 75 mm sash width. Between the frame faces: 2400 minus 36 minus 36, which is 2328 mm. Two leaves of about 1201 mm each, overlapping by about 75 mm at the centre. Retract one leaf fully and the clear opening is about 1126 mm. That is a little under half of 2400 mm. Now unbolt the second leaf and do it again: still about 1126 mm. The number is our arithmetic, built on published figures, and it is an example, not a claim about a product. Ask your supplier for the same three numbers on your series and your width.
If the layout does not move the opening, what does? The width of the unit. A North American glass and door site publishes clear-opening figures for two-panel sliders that make the point without any arithmetic at all.
| Unit width | Clear opening quoted by that source | Does it clear a 32 inch doorway | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 in (five feet) | About 28 to 30 in | No | The most common two-panel size, and the one that surprises people |
| 72 in (six feet) | About 34 to 36 in; one figure gives about 35 in | Yes | Roughly where a two-panel slider starts to behave like a doorway |
| 84 in (seven feet) | About 40 to 42 in | Yes | Wide enough to move furniture through |
A widely quoted accessibility figure for a doorway is a minimum clear opening of 32 inches. A five-foot two-panel slider can fall short of it. Making the second leaf operable will not fix that. Making the unit wider will. "Double" is not a substitute for twelve inches of wall.
Treat that 32 inch figure the way it is presented - a rule of thumb quoted from a public source, not a code value. Egress and accessibility thresholds are set by the authority that has jurisdiction over your building, and they are measured on the clear opening, not on the product name. The same applies to a 60x80 sliding door: the two numbers in the name describe the unit, and the number that matters is the one nobody prints in the name.
This table is the article. If you read nothing else, read this and the section on handing.
| What changes | Single - one fixed, one sliding | Double - both sliding | What it means on site |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where the opening is | At one end, permanently | At either end, chosen each time you use it | If a sofa sits against one half, a single slider lets you put the opening on the other half and leave it there. A double slider gives you a second opening in the one place you can never use it |
| Who decides where it is | The factory, at the moment you sign the order | Nobody; you decide every morning | Handing is irreversible on most exterior sliders. See the section below |
| What the non-moving panel is allowed to be | A fixed light: often direct-glazed, no rollers, no sash on the meeting edge | Another full sash: stile, rollers, lock, interlock | The fixed half can carry glass the moving half cannot, because it never has to ride on anything |
| The interlock | A moving stile closing against a panel braced to the frame on four sides | Two moving stiles closing against each other | See the next section. This is where the extra money goes, and it is not into the opening |
| Locks and anti-lift | One lock, one keeper on a rigid member, one anti-lift point to get right | Two locks, two keepers, two anti-lift points | A double is only as secure as the leaf nobody locked. The classic attack on a slider is lifting the moving leaf off its track |
| Roller adjustment | One body to level against a frame that does not move | Two bodies that must also agree with each other at the centre joint | If the two leaves are not at the same height, the joint will not line up, and the symptom looks like a lock problem |
| The screen | One panel with exactly one job: cover the opening | One panel covering one of the two possible openings, or two panels | One screen supplier states plainly that a single sliding screen panel covers the width of the opening only. And at least one window manufacturer notes that insect screens are handed the same as the unit |
The vertical joint in the middle of a two-panel slider is the only place in the product where the door has to be two things at once: a sliding joint and a weather seal. Almost everything difficult about sliders happens there, and it happens there in both layouts. What changes is how many sides of that joint can move away from you.
On a single slider, the moving leaf closes against a panel that is fixed to the frame on all four sides. The seal in the meeting stile presses against something that cannot move. On a double slider, both sides of the joint can move, and the joint now has to hold two leaves in the right relationship to each other before either of them can be in the right relationship to the frame.
Three published details are worth having, because they are the difference between a five-minute fix and a service call.
That last one is the whole argument in a sentence. When both leaves move, the joint between them stops being a seal and becomes a structural connection that has to work in both directions of wind. You have not bought twice the opening. You have bought a joint that has to be right in two directions instead of one.
If you read one sentence of this section, read this one: on a double slider, the two leaves have to agree with each other before either of them can agree with the frame. Every "it catches in the middle" complaint is that sentence, misread as a hardware defect.
One published explainer identifies the fixed panel in a way that sounds trivial and is not: it is typically secured to the frame with screws or fixed glazing beads, unlike the operating panel, which rolls freely. Four consequences follow from that one sentence, and they are the honest case for the single slider.
Which gives the sentence nobody in this category writes: half of a single sliding door is a window, and a window is a better thing than a door you never open.
For a single slider you have to state, at the moment you order, which side is fixed. The industry writes this as a two-letter code read from the outside looking in: X for the operating panel, O for the stationary one. XO means the operating panel is on the left as seen from outside; OX means it is on the right.
Now the part that should worry you. Two pages published by the same sliding-door hardware supplier give those two codes opposite meanings. One page says XO is operating-on-the-left and OX is operating-on-the-right. The other page's table says XO is the right-hand panel sliding and OX is the left-hand one. A window manufacturer's own help centre and an independent explainer both use the first convention. So the code, on its own, is worth nothing.
Three rules follow, and they cost nothing:
Why it cannot be fixed later: on most exterior sliders the sill is sloped and the weep holes are directional, the operating leaf runs on a raised rail and the fixed panel sits in a fixed channel. Reversing it means taking the whole frame out of the opening and turning it around, which damages the flashing and the weatherproofing on the way. One hardware supplier tells the story of a contractor who ordered a container of doors for an apartment building with the handing wrong: the project slipped by weeks and the cost was large.
And the mistake doubles, because at least one window manufacturer states that insect screens are handed the same as the unit. Get the handing wrong and you receive a door that opens the wrong way plus a screen that can only ever cover the side you do not use.
A double slider has no handing, which sounds like an advantage. It is - right up to the moment you need a screen, a lock keeper, or a replacement part, and discover that having no handing means having no reference point either.
None of this is an argument against it. It is an argument for buying it for the reason it is actually good at.
The honest limit: on a hinged pair, "double" gets you both leaves out of the opening entirely, because hinged leaves do not have to park behind each other. On a slider, "double" gets you a second choice of door, in a hole that stayed the same size.
A fitter's guide in the United Kingdom puts the failure mode in one line that applies to both layouts: a slider is less forgiving than a hinged door, because a hinged door that is out of true can be adjusted at the hinge, while a sliding panel that is out of true binds along its whole travel.
The most common reason someone asks this question is that they want more opening than either layout can give. That is not a single-versus-double question at all.
| What you actually want | Why neither two-panel layout delivers it | What to look at instead |
|---|---|---|
| More than half the wall open | Both layouts park one leaf where the other one is standing | A three-panel unit with two leaves stacking - one public guide puts this at about two thirds - or a pocketing system, which needs a wall cavity that has to be designed before the wall exists |
| The whole opening clear | Two sliding leaves cannot occupy the same space at the same time | A hinged pair or a folding set - a bifold swing door or a French pair. All of them want floor or wall space that a slider does not |
| A 32 inch clear opening out of a 60 inch hole | The hole sets the ceiling. The layout does not move it | A wider unit. There is no configuration that beats arithmetic |
| A leaf you can lift out for cleaning | This is a property of the system, not of single or double | Ask whether both leaves are liftable and what the anti-lift device does when they are |
| The biggest possible pane of glass for the money | Every operable leaf costs a stile, rollers, a lock and an interlock | A fixed light plus one operable leaf - which is the single slider, and which is why it is still the most common patio door made |
One thing we would rather say than sell around: our published catalogue is a sliding-door and sliding-window catalogue. Our folding, swing and entry-door category pages are empty at the time of writing. If your requirement is a genuinely full-width opening, the right answer may be a product we do not make, and we will tell you that rather than sell you a slider with the second leaf unbolted.
This is the table to attach to a purchase order. The right-hand column is the one that matters.
| Item | What is published | What you still have to ask | Why the gap is there |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame wall width | SL112/167: 112 mm single or two-track, 167 mm three-track. SL126/182: 126 mm and 182 mm. SL155: 155 mm four-track | Your wall build-up, layer by layer, from the outside face inward, in millimetres | A frame depth is a property of the series, not a function of how many panels move. The four-track is shallower than the three-track |
| Visible frame width | SL126/182: 36 mm. SL112/167: 26 mm. SL155: 62 mm | The interlock sightline, dimensioned on a section, for your exact configuration | The published sash width is not the same measurement as the joint you look at every day |
| Sash width | SL126/182: 75 mm or 96 mm. SL112/167: 53 mm or 75 mm. SL155: 44.5 mm | Which of the two sash widths applies to your leaves | Some series publish more than one, and the quote rarely says which one you got |
| Maximum single sash | SL155: 2800 by 2600 mm. SL126/182: up to about 2.5 by 3.0 m | The maximum for a fixed light, stated separately from the maximum for a moving leaf | They are not the same limit, and only one of them is usually printed. This is the single most useful question about a single slider |
| Load figure | SL112/167 driving capacity up to 220 kg per sash. SL155 400 kg on a 20-wheel self-balancing carriage | The working load per leaf for your glass build, not the rated capacity | A rating is measured on a static sash. Glass is roughly 2.5 kg per square metre for every millimetre of thickness, so the glass build decides what the leaf actually weighs |
| Opening method | TS130: one fixed plus one movable, or middle fixed with two sides movable. SL112/167: flexible fixed and movable panel configuration | The exact sequence of X and O, the viewpoint it is read from, and the number of panels | The catalogue names an option, not the arrangement you are buying. On our own side-press window, "two movable" is a three-panel product with the fixed panel in the middle - which is not what the word double means anywhere else |
| Track height | SL126/182: 43 mm high track, 8 mm low track. SL112/167: 45 mm high-drop bottom track with an optional 85 mm water barrier | Which track you are getting, and where the water goes from it | The track is a threshold decision and a drainage decision, and both are made before the floor is finished |
| Air, water and wind ratings | Not published by series | The rating, the name of the standard it was tested to, and whether the test specimen was a sliding configuration | A number without a standard name and a described specimen is an adjective |
| Thermal value | Not published for the sliding series | A calculated value for your size, your split and your glass build | A thermal figure belongs to a specimen, not to a series. It is not printed. It can be calculated |
Not published does not mean worse. It means there is nothing to compare. Ask for the number that belongs to your unit, and put it in writing. What is written into the order is what can be held to; what is printed in a brochure is an opinion.
Fill these in and the conversation changes. Leave them blank and every supplier prices a different door.
| Field | What a good answer looks like | What happens if you leave it blank |
|---|---|---|
| Unit width and height, in millimetres | One pair of numbers, stated as the built frame size, not a nominal callout | Everyone prices a different door and none of them is wrong |
| Panel count and arrangement | A sequence such as XO or XX, with the viewpoint stated | You may receive the mirror image of what you drew |
| Which leaf is operable | Marked on a plan, not described in words | The handing mistake is the expensive one, and it is found on site |
| Clear opening you need, in millimetres | A number, measured between the frame faces with the leaf fully retracted | Nobody can tell you whether the unit you are buying is big enough until it is installed |
| Which way it has to open | Left or right from the outside, and left or right from the inside | A door that opens away from the traffic route is a permanent, daily annoyance |
| Glass build | Thickness, cavity, coating, and whether any leaf is laminated | Leaf weight, and therefore the roller specification, is a function of the glass |
| Which leaf carries the heavier glass | Stated explicitly, if the two leaves differ | A fixed light can carry what a moving leaf cannot, but only if somebody says so in writing |
| Track option | Low or high, and the height in millimetres | The threshold is decided before the floor is finished, and it is not reversible afterwards |
| Screen | Yes or no, which leaf it covers, and its handing | Screens are handed the same as the unit, so a screen ordered late matches nothing |
| Anti-lift and locking | How many points, and on which leaf | The classic attack on a slider is lifting the moving leaf out of its track, and it costs one missing part |
| Wall build-up | From outside face to inside face, layer by layer, in millimetres | The published frame wall width is a depth, not a wall thickness, and the two are confused constantly |
| Whether any leaf has to come out | For cleaning, or for moving large items, and which leaf | A fixed light is not a leaf you can lift out, and this is discovered with a piano in the hall |
| Ask this | An answer worth having | An answer that sounds reasonable and tells you nothing |
|---|---|---|
| How wide is the clear opening | A dimension in millimetres, on a plan, for this unit | About half |
| Which panel is fixed | Marked on a plan, with the viewpoint stated | We will confirm before production |
| Can I have both panels sliding | Yes, and here is what it changes | Yes, it is better |
| What is the interlock sightline | A dimension from a section, for this configuration | It is a slim interlock |
| What can the fixed light carry | A glass build and a maximum size, in writing | The same as the sliding panel |
| What is the working load per leaf | A figure for your glass build, per leaf | Up to 400 kg |
| Which track am I getting | The height in millimetres, and the drainage path | The standard track |
| Is the screen handed | Yes, and it matches the unit, and here is how | Screens are included |
| Can the leaf be lifted out | Yes or no, and what the anti-lift device does when it can | It is secure |
| Is it reversible | No, and here is which part makes it irreversible | We can change it on site |
| Symptom | Most likely cause | Usually a defect? | First action | What people do instead, and why it makes things worse |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draught down the centre of the door | The meeting stile has lost contact; a few millimetres of roller drop is enough | Usually not; it is adjustment | Adjust roller height in quarter turns, keeping both ends level | replace all the perimeter weatherstrip. The leak is at the joint, and caulk does not reach it |
| The leaf catches at the centre as it closes | The two leaves are no longer at the same height, or the interlock is mis-set | Usually not | Check both leaves at the joint, not just the one that sticks | File the interlock. You have made a permanent gap out of an adjustable one |
| The lock will not throw after an adjustment | Raising the leaf moved it relative to the keeper | No | Move the strike plate | Force the handle. That is how handles and gearboxes die |
| The door is hard to push | Rollers, track grit, or a frame that is out of true | Depends which | Find out which before buying anything | Lubricate. Grease holds the grit that caused the problem |
| Water over the inner upstand | Drainage slots blocked with grit | Not a manufacturing fault | Clear the slots with a brush | Seal the outside perimeter. That traps the water the slots existed to release |
| The second leaf never gets opened | The opening it creates is on the side where the furniture is | Not a defect at all | Nothing. It is a specification mistake, not a repair | Nothing. It simply stays shut for the life of the building |
No. In a two-panel unit, both layouts give you roughly half the unit width, minus the interlock. Both leaves cannot be open at the same time, because each has to park where the other one is standing. If you need more opening, the lever is the width of the unit or the number of panels, not the number of panels that move.
Generally not. The sill is sloped and the weep holes are directional, the operating leaf runs on a raised rail, and the fixed panel sits in a fixed channel and is usually secured with screws or fixed glazing beads. Converting is a new frame, not a new panel.
Both depend on the lock and on the anti-lift device, because the common attack on any slider is lifting the moving leaf out of its track. A double has two of each, which means two opportunities to leave one undone. Security is a specification line, not a layout choice.
The joint is the same joint. On a double, both sides of it can move, so there is one more thing that has to stay in adjustment. Neither layout has the compression seal a hinged door gets from its locking points; a slider seals by contact at the interlock, and contact is an adjustment.
Yes, if insects matter to you. Screens are handed the same as the unit, one supplier notes that a single sliding screen panel covers the width of the opening only, and a screen ordered after the door is a screen that matches nothing.
Because the question is asked of us weekly, and the honest answer is sometimes a product we do not make. Our folding, swing and entry-door categories are empty at the time of writing. We would rather say that on this page than let you find it out when the container arrives.
One last time, and it applies to this page too: do not take a number from an article - this one included - and put it into a drawing, a specification or an order. Ask for the figure that belongs to your unit, in millimetres, with the standard and the test specimen named. Anything else is a conversation, not a specification.